Solutions · Agencies and integrators

Consistent validation for every client project.

Manage plans, cases, runs, and release verdicts per project, and deliver reports backed by evidence to clients. Experts cover capacity gaps on the same platform.

Request a demoTalk about managed QA

Onboarding journey

Five steps from evaluation to expansion.

Start with one active project, review its deliverables, combine the services you need, and expand to the next project.

  1. Define the evaluation scope

    Choose an active project and check repository access, target URL, test accounts, and requirements. The platform—web, Android, iOS, or server/API—determines whether screen collection is needed.

    Step 1

  2. Review deliverables in a demo

    See the plan, case table, three-engine results, verdict card, and HTML report. Agree on the deliverables you will share with clients.

    Step 2

  3. Scope the first project

    Document the scope around one repository, staging URL, test accounts, test data, and requirements. Deliverables are the plan, cases, execution report, and release notes.

    Step 3

  4. Choose your service configuration

    Combine platform access, initial setup, and expert services as needed. External tools and test devices required for a client's environment are scoped separately per project.

    Step 4

  5. Expand and support

    After the first project, add workspaces for the next. Product and onboarding support scope and response times are defined in the contract.

    Step 5

Product experience and deliverables

Deliver verdicts with evidence.

Every run retains an HTML report, logs, and failure screenshots and videos. Verdicts are PASS, CONDITIONAL, or FAIL. Requirements coverage below the 80% target produces CONDITIONAL instead of PASS.

  • Coverage across requirements, checklists, and screens
  • Screenshots, replay videos, and logs for every failed case
  • Create Jira issues from failures and link them to results
  • Client accounts for viewing results and deciding on releases
More about test reports & evidence

Self-service and delegation

Choose what to own and what to delegate.

Your team connects repositories, approves cases, runs checks, and reviews results. Delegate time-consuming exploratory QA, triage, UX reviews, revalidation, and release notes. Both approaches work in the same workspace.

  • Your team: project setup, PR case approvals, automation rules, and result review
  • Experts: validation setup, plan reviews, exploratory QA, and test maintenance
  • Experts: triage, UX reviews, revalidation, and release notes
  • Set a different scope for each project
Talk about managed QA

Service configuration

Combine only what you need.

Choose from four components based on your project. Work proceeds under a mutual NDA and written services agreement.

ComponentWhat's includedHow scope is set
Platform access
  • Organization workspaces and projects
  • Test planning · Case generation · API and UI validation
  • Release verdicts · Reports · Security checks
Agreed during consultation based on project count and user roles
Initial setup
  • Repository connection · Target URL · Test accounts
  • Requirements documents and screen collection
  • Automation rules and Jira integration
Configured once for the first project's scope
Expert services
  • Plan reviews · Exploratory QA · Test maintenance
  • Triage · UX reviews · Revalidation · Release notes
Written agreement for the defined scope and period
External tools and devices
  • External tools needed for the client's environment
  • Project-specific test devices, accounts, and other requirements
Scoped separately for each project

Combine components differently per project and add workspaces as you expand.

Roles

Three roles. One project.

Your agency, experts, and the client access the same project with their own permissions.

QA leadConfigure · Approve · Sign off releasesYour agency's QA lead manages setup, case approval, and release sign-off. Approval authority stays with your agency even when experts perform the work.
TesterWrite · Execute · ReviewWrite and execute cases and review results. Team members and experts see the same evidence on the same screens.
ClientView results · Decide on releasesClient contacts see only their own project's verdicts, reports, and coverage. Other projects and organizations remain hidden.

Frequently asked questions

Before onboarding

Will data from different clients get mixed together?
Workspaces are separated by organization. Clients see only their own projects and results, while your agency manages the projects assigned to it.
What do we need for the first project?
GitHub repository access, a staging URL, test accounts, and requirements documents in DOCX, XLSX, PPTX, PDF, image, or Markdown format. Test data is agreed according to the client's policies.
Some clients use repositories outside GitHub.
GitHub connections currently use the GitHub App. Other repository hosts are in preview; we confirm the applicable scope for each project during consultation.
What do experts handle, and what stays with our team?
Experts perform agreed tasks such as plan reviews, exploratory QA, triage, revalidation, and release notes. Case approval and release sign-off stay with your agency's QA lead.
What about our existing CI and issue tracker?
Runs start from GitHub Actions push and PR events, so your existing pipeline can stay. Failures become Jira issues connected to your existing issue workflow.
Can deliverables match our client's reporting format?
Each run retains an HTML report and evidence files; plans are Markdown documents. With expert services, release notes can be prepared in your client's reporting format.

Start with your next client project.

Demo one active project. A repository and staging URL are enough to begin.

Request a demoImplementation consultation

sales@qoretix.com+82-33-242-0210Weekdays, 10:00–18:00 KST